Current:Home > MyWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -FundGuru
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
View
Date:2025-04-14 04:45:49
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (81)
Related
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Group agrees to buy Washington Commanders from Snyder family for record $6 billion
- In Climate-Driven Disasters, Older People and the Disabled Are Most at Risk. Now In-Home Caregivers Are Being Trained in How to Help Them
- Disney Star CoCo Lee Dead at 48
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- The latest workers calling for a better quality of life: airline pilots
- You Won't Believe How Much Gymnast Olivia Dunne Got Paid for One Social Media Post
- California Released a Bold Climate Plan, but Critics Say It Will Harm Vulnerable Communities and Undermine Its Goals
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $240 Crossbody Bag for Just $59
Ranking
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Families scramble to find growth hormone drug as shortage drags on
- More shows and films are made in Mexico, where costs are low and unions are few
- Too Hot to Work, Too Hot to Play
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Houston lesbian bar was denied insurance coverage for hosting drag shows, owner says
- A record number of Americans may fly this summer. Here's everything you need to know
- Warming Trends: Bill Nye’s New Focus on Climate Change, Bottled Water as a Social Lens and the Coming End of Blacktop
Recommendation
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
Lack of air traffic controllers is industry's biggest issue, United Airlines CEO says
Kyra Sedgwick Serves Up the Secret Recipe to Her and Kevin Bacon's 35-Year Marriage
Meta is fined a record $1.3 billion over alleged EU law violations
US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
One Candidate for Wisconsin’s Senate Race Wants to Put the State ‘In the Driver’s Seat’ of the Clean Energy Economy. The Other Calls Climate Science ‘Lunacy’
Parties at COP27 Add Loss and Damage to the Agenda, But Won’t Discuss Which Countries Are Responsible or Who Should Pay
Frustration Simmers Around the Edges of COP27, and May Boil Over Far From the Summit